Legal Opinion

In re Rakim W.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 23, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), dated April 21, 2003, which, af*454ter a fact-finding hearing, found that she had neglected her child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Ordinarily, when a dispositional order has been entered in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, an appeal from the earlier fact-finding order must be dismissed as superseded (see Matter of Elishaba A., 269 AD2d 392 [2000]; Matter of Shoshana L., 239 AD2d 417…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re A. ChildrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re "Baby Girl" E.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re Elishaba A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Rakim W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re Klara L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Matter of Nova C. H. (Meredith H.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API