Davis v. United States
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
WAY, District Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the supplemental answer seeks to contest the validity of the insurance contract upon which this suit is based, contrary, it is urged, to the provisions of section 307 of the World War Veterans’ Act of 1924, as amended by the Act of July 3, 1930, § 24 (46 Stat. 1001 [38 USCA § 518]). That amendment reads as follows:
“Sec. 24. That section 307 of the World War Veterans’ Act, 1924, as amended (section 518, title 38, United States Code), be hereby amended to read as follows:
“ ‘Sec. 307. All contracts or policies of insurance heretofore or hereafter…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Flannagan v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Scales v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Jolley v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- MacK v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Sanders v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schmidt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Hicks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. KaminskyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Boulger v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1932
- Le Blanc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.