Legal Opinion
Dickson v. Hardy
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided May 1, 1933No. 32241PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAND, Justice.
The present suit is a contest between petitioner, C. Bickham Dickson, commissioner of public utilities, and the defendant, George W. Hardy, Jr., mayor, over the supervision and control of Cross Lake, the source of the water supply of the city of Shreveport.
The commission plan of government, as provided by Act No. 302 of 1910, was adopted by that city. Under section 4 of this statute, a distribution of the functions and powers of government is provided for in the following manner:
“And the powers and duties shall be distributed into and among five departments as follows:
“1.…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Keigley v. Bench, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- Stewart v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1944
- LaFleur v. RobertsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Hawkins v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- State Ex Rel. City of Shreveport v. DicksonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.