Legal Opinion

Sahyers v. Prugh, Holliday & Karatinos, P.L.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 3, 2009No. 08-10848PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDSON, Chief Judge:

This appeal is about the power of a district court to supervise the work of the lawyers who practice before it. Christine Sahyers (Plaintiff) appeals a district court order denying her request for attorney’s fees and costs in her lawsuit under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219. We affirm the order.

Background

Plaintiff worked as a paralegal at the law firm Prugh, Holliday & Karatinos, P.L. After she left the firm, she retained her own lawyer. Then she sued Prugh, Holliday & Karatinos, P.L. and its named partners (Defendants) for alleged violations…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Dees v. Hydradry, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2010
  2. Anthony Vines v. Welspun Pipes Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  3. Campusano v. Lusitano Construction LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Wescott Agri-Products, Inc. v. Sterling State Bank, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. Peterson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API