Legal Opinion

Combes v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2000No. 25407Published

1Opinion of the Court

KIDWELL, Justice.

Robert Combes, claimant, appeals the Industrial Commission’s determination that he was not entitled to permanent and total disability benefits because he did not establish that his pre-existing condition or occupational disease was aggravated by an “accident.” On appeal, Combes argues that the Court should overrule three Idaho cases, thus disavowing the “accident” requirement currently established in Idaho worker’s compensation law.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Claimant Robert Combes (Combes) began work with the employer in this case, Yanke Machine Shop, Inc. (Yanke), in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Suitts v. First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bowman v. Twin Falls Const. Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Struhs v. Protection Technologies, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Taylor v. Soran Restaurant, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Nelson v. Ponsness-Warren Idgas EnterprisesIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API