Kessel v. Murray

*18*17This appeal concerns itself with two primary propositions: First, the liability of the defendant Murray to the plaintiff; and second, the liability of certain defendants in *18^ cross-petition of Murray to reimburse him ™ event that he is compelled to pay the obli-gation in suit. Defendant Murray is the appellant as to plaintiff Kessel, and appellee as to defendants on his cross-petition.

One phase of this appeal presents a legal question; the other, primarily a question of fact. At the outset, it is quite important to have in mind the nature of the action and the salient facts disclosed by…