Villars v. City of Portsmouth & American Fidelity Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.
The plaintiff states on information and belief that the city has a liability policy with the defendant company which affords coverage to him individually and to his minor son. He then alleges that his counsel cannot “advise as to coverage until he has had an opportunity to examine the master policy of said insurance company which has now been located in the possession of the City Clerk . ... ” Our declaratory judgment statute (RSA 491:22) which the plaintiff would invoke, reads as follows: “Any person claiming a present legal or equitable right or title may maintain a petition against any…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Merrill v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Ruark v. SmithSuperior Court of Delaware · 1959
- Verrastro v. GreccoConnecticut Superior Court · 1958
- Salem Coalition for Caution, Inc. v. Town of SalemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Wuelper v. University of New HampshireSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.