Legal Opinion
Phillips v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 2, 2006No. 04-56411; D.C. No. CV 02-08137-CBMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Petitioner-Appellant Allicia Phillips (“Phillips”) appeals the district court’s denial of her petition for writ of habeas corpus, brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Following the district court’s denial of Phillips’ motion for a certificate of appealability (“COA”), we granted a COA under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(3) with respect to the issue of whether trial counsel’s failure to seek suppression of the fruits of the warrantless search of Phillips’ backyard violated her Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdic*679tion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kenneth Paul Dows v. Tana WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Rodolfo EchegoyenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Maldonado v. BurgeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Leary v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021