Commonwealth v. Lauria
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
Lauria, Long and Joyce, charged with aggravated rape,2 were not brought to trial within a year of their arraignments and, therefore, are presumptively entitled to dismissal óf those charges in accordance with Mass.R.Crim.P. 36(b)(1), 378 Mass. 909 (1979), unless the Commonwealth justifies the delay. See Barry v. Commonwealth, 390 Mass. 285, 291-294 (1983); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 401 Mass. 698, 702 (1988). By agreement, the government and the defendants stopped the running of time under rule 36 as of September 28, 1989, thus, setting the stage for motions to dismiss under the rule by the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Commonwealth v. BoydMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- People v. HamiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Barry v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- United States v. Robert Nick Regilio and Guillermo Saint BlancardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LauriaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Commonwealth v. AmidonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998