Legal Opinion

Peterson Bank v. Langendorf

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 9, 1985No. 84-2369PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sullivan

This is an appeal by Peterson Bank (the bank), from an order entered at the close of its case during trial granting defendants’ motion for a directed finding and dismissing the bank’s mortgage foreclosure action. It is contended here that reversal is required because the trial court decision was based on the erroneous finding that the mortgage lacked consideration.

On December 4, 1979, defendants went to the bank to borrow money to enable them to purchase an insurance company. By signing a mortgage on their house and a note for $100,000 they obtained a line of credit in that amount. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tepfer v. Deerfield Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Sears v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  3. Totten v. TottenIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Collins v. CarlileIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Riddle v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Bank of Geneva v. SorensonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. Bartlett Bank & Trust Co. v. McJunkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Farm Credit Bank of St. Louis v. BiethmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Eagle Bank v. Community Bank of Trenton (In Re Zurliene)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 1989
  5. In the Matter of James D. Bailey, Georganna Bailey, Debtors. Appeal of State Bank of ArthurCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API