In re Account of Manhardt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Frank P. Manhardt, individually and as removed administrator of the estate of Margaret Seitz, and as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Charles L. Mary, from a -decree of, the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Erie, entered in :said Surrogate’s Court on the 21st day of July, 1896, upon the decision of the court rendered in a proceeding settling, his accounts and directing him to pay'over the funds and deliver the property of the estate to William…
Read the full summary
Appeal by Frank P. Manhardt, individually and as removed administrator of the estate of Margaret Seitz, and as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Charles L. Mary, from a -decree of, the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Erie, entered in :said Surrogate’s Court on the 21st day of July, 1896, upon the decision of the court rendered in a proceeding settling, his accounts and directing him to pay'over the funds and deliver the property of the estate to William B. Frye, the administrator de bonis non of the estate of Margaret Seitz. •In December, 1872, Charles L.'Mary, a…
1Opinion of the CourtFollett, J.
But two questions are raised on this appeal: (1) Is Frank P. Manhardt entitled to retain in his possession, as administrator of the estate of Charles L. Mary with the will annexed, the choses in action which were in terms payable to- -Margaret Seitz and in her *5possession at her death ? (2) Is Frank P. Manhardt, the donee of the bond and mortgage executed by him to Margaret Seitz, to secure the payment of $2,000 ?
It is conceded that all the property devised and bequeathed by Charles L. Mary will, on the settlement of the estate of Margaret Seitz, pass, under the will of her husband, two-thirds…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beall v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Grey v. . GreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- In re Wiegel's EstateNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Caulkins v. . BoltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Bliss v. FosdickNew York Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re the Estate of CanfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Fouts v. NanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Humble v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Bray v. O'RourkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Snook v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.