Conner v. Wells
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Jackson Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Morris, C.
— The appellee commenced this suit for the purpose of correcting and reforming a deed executed by the appellant Conner and his wife to the appellant Alexander M. Thompson.
The complaint states that for ten years prior to the 1st day of October, 1868, James C. Wells and the said Alexander M. Thompson had been partners in business; that, on the — day of July, 1864, as such partners, they borrowed $1,000 of one Samuel Louden, for the use of the firm, and gave to said Louden their note for the money borrowed; that they invested *198the money borrowed in the purchase of 200 acres of land,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Modisett v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1831
- Musselman v. KentIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Orth v. JenningsIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
- Jeffries v. SherburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Gentry v. AllisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wells v. BentonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Paxton v. SterneIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Gushwa v. GushwaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931