Legal Opinion
In re Miller
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 18, 2017No. Bky. No. 17-15592 ELFPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ERIC L. FRANK U.S. BANKRUPTCY, JUDGE
AND NOW, WHEREAS:
A. A reaffirmation agreement of the kind specified in 11 U.S.C. § 524(c) between the Debtor Andrew S. Miller (“the Debtor”) and TruMark Financial Credit Union has been filed with the court.
B. It appears likely that the proposed reaffirmation agreement is not subject to 11 U.S.C. § 524(m)(l). See 11 U.S.C. § 524(m)(2).
C. Nonetheless, the reaffirmation agreement is subject to 11 U.S.C. § 524(c), (d). See In re Coleman, 2010 WL 5067429, at *2 (Bankr. D.S.D. Dec. 7, 2010).
⅜ H* H* H* ⅝ ⅜
D. Neither the Debtor’s schedules nor " the Debtor’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Morton (In Re Morton)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- In Re VargasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- In Re HarveyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2010
- In re GriffinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2017