Legal Opinion

Parkhurst v. Gloucester Mutual Fishing Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 15, 1868PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGray, J.

This is an action upon a policy of insurance by which the Gloucester Mutual Fishing Insurance Company “ cause David Parkhurst, for whom it may concern, to be insured, lost or not lost,” a certain sum for one year on seven eighths of the schooner James Sayward, “ to be insured in the manner prescribed by the by-laws, to be subject to all the restraints and liabilities therein set forth.” The. extracts from the by-laws, which are printed on the third page of the policy, show that it is intended to insure a fishing vessel on a fishing voyage. But neither the policy nor the by-laws contain any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waters v. Merchants' Louisville InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. Yeaton v. FrySupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  3. Rogers v. Mechanics' Ins. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1841
  4. Howland v. GreenwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  5. Cleaveland v. NortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Standard Electric Supply Co. v. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  2. Long Bros. v. J. K. Armsby Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. Hibernia InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Matheson v. Equitable Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Atkinson v. . Great Western Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API