Parkhurst v. Gloucester Mutual Fishing Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGray, J.
This is an action upon a policy of insurance by which the Gloucester Mutual Fishing Insurance Company “ cause David Parkhurst, for whom it may concern, to be insured, lost or not lost,” a certain sum for one year on seven eighths of the schooner James Sayward, “ to be insured in the manner prescribed by the by-laws, to be subject to all the restraints and liabilities therein set forth.” The. extracts from the by-laws, which are printed on the third page of the policy, show that it is intended to insure a fishing vessel on a fishing voyage. But neither the policy nor the by-laws contain any…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Waters v. Merchants' Louisville InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Yeaton v. FrySupreme Court of the United States · 1809
- Rogers v. Mechanics' Ins. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1841
- Howland v. GreenwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Cleaveland v. NortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
3Cited by5 opinions
- Standard Electric Supply Co. v. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Long Bros. v. J. K. Armsby Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1891
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Hibernia InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Matheson v. Equitable Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Atkinson v. . Great Western Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875