Legal Opinion

Michaels v. Hillman

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action for an injunction and damages.

1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.

The conflict in this case began when the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America sought to compel recognition of its organization by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs had been maintaining a non-union shop and were endeavoring to keep it such. Ever since its experience with the local union of the United Garment Workers, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, and the breaking down of that union in Bochester in 1915, the plaintiffs had avoided affiliating with any outside union and particularly with the Amalgamated Clothing Workers which was the outgrowth of one of the seceding wings of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Adair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. National Protective Ass'n of Steam Fitters & Helpers v. CummingNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Curran v. . GalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Auburn Draying Co. v. . WardellNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Jacobs v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marshall v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Metropolis Country Club, Inc. v. LewisNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Skolny v. HillmanNew York Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Martin v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API