Legal Opinion

Sundquist v. Gray

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 22, 1930No. 7210PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCushman, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The question first to be considered by the court is as to the propriety of the exceptive allegations of the claimants and the resistance affidavits of the libelant.

Admiralty courts, within the sphere of their jurisdiction, act as courts of equity. Plummer v. Webb, Fed. Cas. No. 11,233, p. 893, decision by Justice Story; Benedict on Admiralty (5th Ed.) § 70.

Among the principles controlling courts of equity recognized and applied in admiralty are matters of estoppel and laches. Higgins v. Anglo-Algerian S. S. Co. (C. C. A.) 248 E. 386 at pages 387 and 389;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Plamals v. S. S. "Pinar Del Rio"Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. The AdourDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927
  3. Lincoln v. Cunard S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  4. The AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
  5. Christianssand Shipping Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The SydfoldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. Hubertz v. VetlesenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1939
  3. Swift & Co. Packers v. Compania Colombiana Del Caribe, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API