Legal Opinion

Hubertz v. Vetlesen

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 20, 1939No. 15554PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a hearing on exceptions to the first cause of action, alleged in the libel herein.

This is a suit in rem, in Admiralty, to recover on two causes of action, the first for indemnity for personal injuries, and the second for wages.

In the first cause of action, it is alleged that on or about the 10th day of April, 1935, while the Yacht “Vema” was alongside her pier at the foot of 23rd Street, Brooklyn, New York, the libellant, while performing his duties as a member of the crew of the “Vema”, and while engaged in making fast a main sail, together with other members…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marshall v. International Mercantile Marine Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. The SydfoldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  3. United States v. Alex Dussel Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929
  4. Westfall Larson & Co. v. All-Man-Hubble Tug Boat Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  5. Farnham v. The SeminoleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Suspine v. Compania Transatlantica Centroamericana, S. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  2. Miller v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1952
  3. Bogdanovich v. GasperDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
  4. Swift & Co. Packers v. Compania Colombiana Del Caribe, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API