Legal Opinion

New York Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 17, 1980No. 1137, Docket 80-4047PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKES, Circuit Judge:

New York Telephone Company (NYT), by this petition to review, seeks to overturn an order of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) asserting jurisdiction over local exchange service when used in connection with interstate foreign exchange (FX)1 and common control switching arrangement (CCSA)2 services. The order also required that any charges concerning the local distribution of-FX and CCSA services that apply only to interstate customers must be filed with the FCC pursuant to section 203 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 203.

NYT had, at the suggestion…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Coca Cola Bottling Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. Lodges 743 & 1746, International Ass'n of Machinists Workers v. United Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. H. P. Welch Co. v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  2. Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Computer & Communications Industry Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  4. Computer and Communications Industry Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, North American Telephone Association, Utilities Telecommunications Council, Tymnet, Inc., Continental Telephone Corporation, Xerox Corporation, Hazeltine Corporation, Alarm Industry Telecommunications Committee of the National Burglar & Fire Alarm Association, Rca Global Communications, Inc., Satellite Business Systems, Motorola, Inc., U.S. Telephone & Telegraph Corporation, American Petroleum Institute, Citicorp, Central Telephone & Utilities Corporation, Comsat General Corporation, American Newspaper Publishers Association, Gte Service Corporation, Sperry Univac Division of Sperry Corporation, Communications Satellite Corporation, International Business MacHines Corporation, American Telephone & Telegraph Company, Computer & Business Equipment Manufacturers Association, Control Data Corporation, United Telephone System, Inc., United Computing Systems, Inc., Southern Pacific Communications Company, Western Union Telegraph Company, Aeronautical Radio, Inc., Isa Communications Services, Inc., Independent Data Communications Manufacturers Association, Inc., Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc., Bunker Ramo Corporation, Gte Telenet Communications Corporation, Municipality of Anchorage D/B/A Anchorage Telephone Utility, Louisiana Public Service Commission, Intervenors. The People of the State of California and the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, International Business MacHines Corp., Intervenors. Independent Data Communications Manufacturers Association, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, International Business MacHines Corp., Intervenors. National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, International Business MacHines Corp., Intervenors. American Newspaper Publishers Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, International Business MacHines Corp., Intervenors. Motorola, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, International Business MacHines Corp., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  5. Lehman v. BurnleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API