Legal Opinion

Malott v. Shimer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1899No. 18,907PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Erom the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

Appellant was, by the circuit court of the United States for the district of Indiana, in 1896, appointed receiver of the Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad Company, and while he was operating the railroad of said company, as such receiver under the orders of the court, appellee’s intestate, while traveling on. said railroad as a postal clerk, was killed in the state of Illinois by the alleged negligence of the defendant.

*37Appellee brought this suit to recover damages for the death of her husband without first obtaining leave of said circuit court so to do. Appellant demurred to the complaint,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McNulta v. LochridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Dillingham v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. McNulta v. LockridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BurtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Malott v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Goode, Adm'x.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Thompson v. Town of Fort BranchIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Kirby v. Dilworth & MarshallTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API