Legal Opinion

Mundell v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed November 9, 1926:

EschweileR, J.

A consideration of the record in this case compels the conclusion that the plaintiff fell because of the slippery condition of the sidewalk rather than because of any depression in the sidewalk.

That the sidewalk was slippery over its entire surface is undisputed; it appears from plaintiff’s own frank admission and is also shown from the testimony of the doctor who assisted in carrying the plaintiff to her own house around the corner, and in so carrying her on a chair it was deemed necessary to walk along the side of the sidewalk…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van der Blomen v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Padden v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hollan v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Ross v. City of ShawanoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Beaudin v. City of OcontoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Damaschke v. City of RacineCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  2. Thiele v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API