Legal Opinion

Padden v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1921PublishedCited by 8 opinions

.. ^Appeal from an order of the circuit court for. Milwaukee county: Oscar M. Fritz, Circuit Judge.. . Action for; personal injuries. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained by the trial court. ■ From the order so doing plaintiff appeals..

1Opinion of the Court

Jones, J.. The portion of the .complaint which-alleges the inspfficiency,of-the walk in question is as-follows:

' "“Said plaintiff further shows to thé-court, upon 'informa1 tion and belief, that-"for some time prior-to said 25th day of November-, A.. D..- 1917, said-defendant city,had maintained what, was commonly,, known as and called a water bubbler, at'a point twelve (12) feet three and one-half (3J4) inches west of the lot line of Eleventh: avenue and north'of said curb line on National avenue; one, (1). foot four’ (4)' inches. That some time prior to said 25th day of November, A. D.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kleiner v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Kawiecka v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Van der Blomen v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Snyder v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Maxwell v. Town of WellingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McChain v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. McCormick v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Morley v. City of ReedsburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hollan v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Gulbrandsen v. H & D, INC.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API