Legal Opinion

Frader v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 17, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

S. H. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Libelant moves to strike as insufficient in law exceptive allegations filed by respondent to a libel brought against the United States to recover damages for injuries and for maintenance and cure. Jurisdiction is alleged to arise under the Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 741 et seq., the Public Vessels Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 781 et seq., and the War Shipping Administration (Clarification) Act of 1943, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1291. The parties have stipulated as to the facts. Upon that stipulation the following findings and conclusions are made.

Findings of Fact

1.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brady v. Roosevelt Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Dahn v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. United States v. MarineCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
  4. Militano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  5. Parr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1950
  2. Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API