Peter F. Comstock Ann Fetter Sue D. Gottfried Irwin R. Hogenauer and Selma Waldman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is taken from conviction under the Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U. S.C. §§ 7, 13, of the crime of unlawful assembly as defined by Washington state law, R.C.W. 9.27.060(2). Appellants attack the Washington statute as unconstitutional.
Appellants do not contend that the conduct with which they are charged was constitutionally protected.1 Whether *1129Washington might, by a properly drawn statute, have made this conduct criminal is not in issue. Appellants contend that the statute under which they were charged and convicted is unconstitutional upon its face as…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Terminiello v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Edwards v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- United States v. Lyle B. Snider, United States of America v. Lyle B. Snider, and Sue T. SniderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- State v. MeansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- In the Matter of Frederick J. ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Manuel Glenn AbascalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.