Legal Opinion

Grattan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 1906No. Nos. 14,805-(194)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey •county, Hallam, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding ¡the verdict or for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action to recover upon a policy of life insurance, in which defendant had a verdict, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or for a new trial.

The facts in this case are as follows: On June 1, 1904, defendant-insurance company’ issued its policy of insurance to one Owen A. Grattan, by which the life of the said Grattan was insured for the-sum of $2,000, in consideration of the payment by him of annual premiums on June 1 of each succeeding year. The first premium was-paid, and the policy delivered to the insured, on June…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cady v. Travelers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Shira v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  3. Furtado v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Fawcett v. Security Ben. Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Chilimidos v. Metropolitan Life Ins.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API