Austin v. Alfred
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROLL, Presiding Judge.
Petitioner Mark Austin seeks special action relief from the respondent judge’s granting of the real party in interest State of Arizona’s motion to compel disclosure of names and reports of mental health experts retained by Austin in anticipation of an insanity defense. For the reasons stated below, we accept jurisdiction and grant partial relief, narrowing the scope of the trial court’s disclosure order.
FACTS
Austin was charged by indictment with first-degree murder, attempted first-degree murder, aggravated assault, and first-degree burglary. Austin submitted to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- State v. BondsWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. KnucklesIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- State of Arizona v. James Clayton JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. KnucklesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- State v. HegyiArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. UlleryColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.