Legal Opinion
In the Interest of R. U.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 1, 1996No. A96A1819PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Harold R. Banke.
The natural parents of R. U. and J. U. appeal from a juvenile court order terminating their parental rights. In their sole enumeration of error, they challenge the sufficiency of the evidence.
The record shows thqt December 1994 was a turning point for the parents. Since that time, they have made steady improvement individually and in their relationship and have accomplished many of the goals included in the case plan developed by the Department of Family & Children Services (“DFCS”). In fact, DFCS presented no admissible evidence after December 1994 of any parental…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Toledo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- In re N. F. R.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- McCormick v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- In the Interest of L. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- In Re CREECHCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In the Interest of K. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- In the Interest of D. C. N. KCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- In the Interest of B. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- In the Interest of R. U.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- In the Interest of E. J.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.