Legal Opinion
Blackstock v. Farm & Home Savings Ass'n
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 24, 1990No. WD 42527PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Blackstock appeals from the dismissal of his petition for a failure to state a cause of action. Blackstock’s petition alleges that Farm & Home Savings Association engaged in a fraudulent loan transaction and an invalid foreclosure sale because it used federal reserve notes as legal tender.
The judgment is affirmed.
On May 12, 1986, appellant and his wife purchased a house with the proceeds of a note from Farm & Home Savings Association (“Farm & Home”). The note was secured by a deed of trust upon the property. The note became delinquent, and Farm & Home foreclosed on the property on May 31,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Means v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Richey v. Meter Investments, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Doran, Inc. v. James A. Green, Jr. & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Breshears v. Malan Oil Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- May v. BaileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Colgan v. Washington Realty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Fields v. R.S.C.D.B., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Vanschoiack v. AdkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Matter of Estate of VoegeleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Biersmith v. Curry Ass'n Management, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.