Legal Opinion
Fumo v. Redevelopment Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 2, 1988No. Appeals, Nos. 2036 C.D. 1986, 2037 C.D. 1986, 1064 C.D. 1987, 2089 C.D. 1987 and 2090 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Doyle,
Before us. for our consideration are various consolidated appeals arising out. of an invitation to bid on two parcels of property situate in the City of Philadelphia. The two contiguous parcels located at 253 and 255 South Ninth Street in Philadelphia were offered up for bid by the Redevelopment. Authority of the City of Philadelphia (Authority). The lot located at 253 South Ninth Street (lot 60A) contained a four-story commercial/residential building. which was in a state of disrepair; the adjacent lot at 255 South Ninth Street (lot 60) had no structure on it. Three…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Totalisator Co., Inc. v. SeligmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Shapiro v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Muncy Area School District v. GardnerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- J. P. Mascaro & Sons, Inc. v. Township of BristolCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Philadelphia Warehousing & Cold Storage v. HallowellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Philadelphia v. CANTEEN, DIV. OF TW SER.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Greek Orthodox Cathedral of Saint George v. Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Frisby v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Greek Orthodox Cathedral of Saint George v. Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Greek Orthodox Cathedral of Saint George v. Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.