Legal Opinion

Hoover-Bond Co. v. Nauts

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 5, 1930No. 3402PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAHN, District Judge.

The plaintiff brings its action against Charles H. Nauts,. collector of internal revenue, to recover the sum of $13,108.87, with interest from May 21, 1925. The plaintiff is engaged in the retail furniture business, approximately 80 per cent, of its sales being on the installment plan. For the year 1917 its corporation tax return was filed showing a net return of $31,750.96, and tax was paid thereon in the sum of $2,014.13. Plaintiff contends that this return was filed on the so-called installment basis. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue refused to allow this basis of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. John M. Brant Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  2. Bowers v. TaftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tull & Gibbs, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  2. Hoover-Bond Co. v. DenmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  3. Marstaller v. ALBINA DOCK CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API