Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 9, 1904PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Wapello District Court. — Hon. Robert Sloan, Judge. The defendant was convicted of the crime of seduction, and he' appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

i. Jurors: qualification. I. As the jury was being impaneled, Frank Creswell, a member of the regular panel, was called into the box. Upon his voir dire examination, he answered that he had on that morning talked with the defen¿an£ about his case; that defendant told him the facts as he claimed them to be, and that thereby some impression was made on his mind. He says he told defendant before the talk that he was a juror, and that he does not know who commenced the conversation. He further says that to some extent he had formed an opinion in regard to the case, but not from what defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PolsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  2. State v. LugarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  3. State v. BessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. PeirceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. State v. KendallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. United States v. Armour & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1906
  4. State v. HassanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. State v. PowersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API