Renaud v. State Court of Mediation & Arbitration
Michigan Supreme Court
Petition by George A. Renaud and others against the State court of mediation and arbitration for writs of mandamus and prohibition to vacate an order .granting a rehearing, and to restrain further proceedings by respondent.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Pingree & Smith are engaged in the business of manufacturing boots and shoes in the city of Detroit, and have a good many men and women in their *649employ. Prior to December 16, 1899, differences arose between the employers and employed over the scale of wages. December 16, 1899, an agreement was signed by Pingree & Smith, on the one side, and Timothy O’Connor and Ernest A. Allen, on the other side, representing the employed, reading in its material part as follows:
“Being unable to agree on prices of the following work, we hereby jointly request an arbitration of the same by your honorable…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Risser v. HoytMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Maclean v. SpeedMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Axtell v. GibbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Streeter v. PatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
- Chandler v. NashMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Melbourne State Bank v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- State v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1912
- Leuschen v. Small Claims CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Mohave County v. StephensArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- Flour City Fuel & Transfer Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.