Legal Opinion
Merrill v. Equitable Surety Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.
On December 30,1925, Walter J. Brisk and Chester A. Brisk, who were about to engage in the taxicab business in the city of Syracuse, filed with the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, pursuant to the provision of section 282-b of the Highway Law (added by Laws of 1922, chap. 612, as amd. by Laws of 1924, chaps. 360, 413; Laws of 1925, chap. 315, and since amd. by Laws of 1927, chaps. 271, 278), an indemnity bond, executed by themselves as principals and by the defendant, Equitable Surety Company of New York, as surety, by the terms of which the surety bound itself unto the People of the State of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Smith v. . MollesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- McMurray v. . NoyesNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Gamble v. CuneoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Sachs v. American Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Franz v. BuderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Feutz v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1949