Abraham Fur Co. v. Cameron
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
This is an action of assumpsit in which plaintiff, the seller of wool, claims the right to recover damages from defendants, the alleged purchasers, by reason of the lat ter’s refusal to accept the goods. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in plaintiff’s favor; defendants appealed.
By both sides we are referred, for the contract or arrangement between the parties, to a series of telegrams between the defendants in Philadelphia and Renard & Henley, wool brokers in St. Louis, who admittedly throughout the dealing acted as middlemen and agents for both…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Bertinelli v. GaloniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Bumbarger v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Schwab v. Continental-Equitable Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Buckley v. Southwestern Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
- Bumbarger v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960