Legal Opinion

Abraham Fur Co. v. Cameron

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1928No. Appeal, 252PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This is an action of assumpsit in which plaintiff, the seller of wool, claims the right to recover damages from defendants, the alleged purchasers, by reason of the lat ter’s refusal to accept the goods. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in plaintiff’s favor; defendants appealed.

By both sides we are referred, for the contract or arrangement between the parties, to a series of telegrams between the defendants in Philadelphia and Renard & Henley, wool brokers in St. Louis, who admittedly throughout the dealing acted as middlemen and agents for both…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bertinelli v. GaloniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Bumbarger v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Schwab v. Continental-Equitable Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Buckley v. Southwestern Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
  5. Bumbarger v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API