Legal Opinion
Zapotocky v. Cit Bank, N.A.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided June 21, 2018No. 17–cv–6377 (JGK)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:
The pro se plaintiff, Darren P. Zapotocky, brings this action alleging that CIT Bank, N.A., breached his reverse mortgage contract by requiring him to obtain flood insurance. Zapotocky also challenges *592a foreclosure judgment entered against him in Connecticut state court.
CIT now moves pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. CIT argues that Zapotocky lacks standing to bring this claim because he forfeited it during a personal…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Butcher v. WendtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Denicolo v. Bd. of Educ. of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Caldrello v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Gordon Alexander Clark - Adversary ProceedingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Laurion v. PHH Mortgage CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.