Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
City of Sacramento v. State of California
California Supreme Court
Decided January 29, 1990No. S006188Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
KAUFMAN, J.,
Concurring and Dissenting.—I concur in the judgment. Given this court’s decision in County of Los Angeles v. State of California (1987) 43 Cal.3d 46 [233 Cal.Rptr. 38, 729 P.2d 202], I am compelled to agree that the obligation imposed on local governments by the 1978 state unemployment insurance legislation is not a “new program or higher level of service” within the meaning of article XIII B, section 6, of the California Constitution, and that for this reason the state is not constitutionally obligated to provide a subvention of funds to reimburse the unemployment insurance costs…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.