Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Standard Bill Posting Co. v. Hastings

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion for an injunction pendente lite and motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtTompkins, J.

We have here two motions, argued and submitted together. The first is for an injunction pendente lite in a suit in equity, brought to restrain the city of Mew-burgh and its officers from removing and destroying a billboard owned by the plaintiff, a corporation engaged in the advertising business. The second is a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the building inspector of the city of Hewburgh to forthwith approve plans for, and consent to the construction of, a closed fence or bill-board which the relator Standard Bill Posting. Company has planned to erect within the limits of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Rochester v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. People Ex Rel. M. Wineburgh Advertising Co. v. MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Gunning System v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cockcroft v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  2. Horton v. Old Colony Bill Posting Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1914
  3. Ryan v. SchneiderNew York City Court · 1928
  4. Cockcroft v. MitchellNew York Supreme Court · 1917
  5. People ex rel. Standard Bill Posting Co. v. HastingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API