Legal Opinion

Jones v. Arel Communications, Unpublished Decision (4-25-2003)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 2003No. C.A. Case No. 19576, T.C. Case No. 02 CV 3764Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-Appellants, M.E. Jones Sub, Ltd., f/k/a W2Com, LLC; M.E. Jones, Inc.; CYMI, Ltd.; and Mitchell E. Jones (hereinafter collectively referred to as Jones), appeal a September 9, 2002 decision of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, which dismissed Jones' claims against Defendants-Appellees, Arel Communications and Software, Ltd.; Arel Acquisitions, Inc.; and Itzak Gross (hereinafter collectively referred to as Arel). The trial court also stayed proceedings for one year as to claims against Defendant-Appellant, National City Bank and as to National City's counter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Cunard Steamship Company Limited v. Salen Reefer Services Ab, United Brands Company, GarnisheeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. United Feature Syndicate, Inc. v. Miller Features Syndicate, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API