People v. Stritzinger
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of multiple counts of child molestation. He contends that certain evidentiary rulings at his trial violated his psychotherapist-patient privilege and his right to con*509frontation. As will appear, we conclude that both points are well taken and compel reversal of the judgment.
During a 15-month period ending May 1981 defendant allegedly engaged in various acts of fondling, mutual masturbation, and oral copulation with his stepdaughter Sarah.1 When Sarah’s mother—defendant’s wife—learned of these activities she arranged for her…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. HawthorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.