Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Consolidated Water Co. v. Odell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1908Published

Appeal by the relator, the Consolidated Water Company of Suburban New York, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Westchester Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 10th day of July, 1908, as denies the relator’s application to cancel an assessment.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

The application for the writ in this proceeding was made for the purpose of reviewing the assessment of personal property of the *476relator in the village of Ardsley for the year 1908, as provided by section 109 of the Village Law (Laws of 1897, chap. 414), which permits a review of assessments in the manner provided by the Tax Law. The proceeding is, therefore, under the provisions of section 253 of chapter 908 of the Laws of 1896. The relator in its petition sets forth that it made a verified statement to the respondents, acting as a board of assessors, showing the condition of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. F. P. Bhumgara Co. v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  2. People Ex Rel. F.P. Bhumgara Company v. . WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. People ex rel. Bishop v. FeitnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API