Legal Opinion

Zak v. Fidelity-Phenix Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 26, 1965No. Gen. 49,710PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mubphy

This is a declaratory judgment action based on an automobile liability insurance policy, issued by defendant to plaintiff and cancelled by defendant prior to an automobile collision which resulted in judgments against plaintiff. A nonjury trial terminated in a judgment for defendant, supported by thirty specific findings by the trial court.

Plaintiff appeals, contending that the cancellation was not effective, and the defendant insurer’s liability has been established as a matter of law.

The action is defended by Fidelity-Phenix Insurance Company, successor to the Metropolitan Casualty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The City of Chicago v. BarnettIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Dorfman v. GerberIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Jablonski v. Washington County Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  4. Dorfman v. GerberAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Browder v. Hanley Dawson Cadillac Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Davidson v. Comet Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Fox v. Industrial Casualty Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Zak v. Fidelity-Phenix InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Reliance Insurance Company v. Shriver, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API