Legal Opinion

First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A. v. Wilkerson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 8, 1994No. 91-CV-0048-15; CA A78166PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Defendant 1 appeals from a summary judgment for plaintiff, ORCP 47, assigning error to the granting of the motion. She first contends that the trial court erred in applying a “subjective” standard to conclude that First Interstate Bank (FIB) had acted in good faith when it paid a check that created an overdraft on defendant’s business account. Next, she asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that there were no genuine issues of material fact. We affirm.

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Best v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Tolbert v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. United States National Bank v. BogeOregon Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Motsinger v. Lithia Rose-FT, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Wardlow v. U-Haul Int'l, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
  3. McGuire v. Bank One, Louisiana, N.A.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Escobar v. National Maintenance Contractors, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
  5. Greg Shepherd v. Costco Wholesale CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API