Legal Opinion

Moquin v. Mervine

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1929No. Appeal, 81PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaefer,

Defendant, who appeals from a judgment on a verdict awarded against him for damages caused to plaintiff by the death of her husband, urges upon us that the recovery should be set aside.

Many questions are presented in appellant’s most elaborate brief. We think it not requisite to discuss them in detail because the real case is of simple statement.

Defendant and his wife and four guests, plaintiff and her deceased husband, and a Mr. and Mrs. Wright, were returning from Pittsburgh to Lock Haven on the night of January 10, 1927. They were riding in defendant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Serfas v. Lehigh & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Davis v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Lorah v. RinehartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Schlossstein Et Ux. v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. McGrath v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Knox v. SimmermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Lithgow v. LithgowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Ravis v. ShehulskieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Knoble Et Ux. v. RitterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Carl v. KurtzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API