Legal Opinion

Dombrowski v. Tomasino

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1965PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

It is fundamental that a jury verdict in an equitable action is merely advisory. Sager v. Hannemann (1959), 6 Wis. (2d) 285, 289, 94 N. W. (2d) 612. In the early case of Stahl v. Gotzenberger (1878), 45 Wis. 121, 123, 124, this court outlined the proper method of procedure where a jury is utilized in an equitable action as follows :

“In all equitable actions the case must be tried by the court, and, before judgment can be entered, the court must find that all the facts necessary to entitle the plaintiff to a judgment have been established by the evidence. If either party desires that any…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peters v. KellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Masino v. SechrestWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Burns v. NemoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  4. Suskey v. DavidoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Schofield v. RideoutWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. ReedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  2. Gorski v. GorskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Schroeder v. RaichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Stevens v. White Motor Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. In Matter of Estate of SteffesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API