Legal Opinion

Halliburton v. Crichton

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1927No. 26309PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

Appellants Halliburton and Moore filed their bill in the chancery court of Quitman county against appellee, Powell Crichton, executor of the will of Minna Lombard Crichton, deceased, and the other appellees, the heirs at law and the devisees and legatees under her will, to recover from the estate of said decedent damagus for an alleged breach of a contract between the appellants and the decedent, and to sell the lands of the decedent situated in Quitman county for the purpose of paying the debts of the estate, including the alleged indebtedness to appellants. Appellees demurred to the bill;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hamburger & Dreyling v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Singer Construction Co. v. GoldsboroughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Rabinowitz v. North Texas Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Realty Bonds & Finance Co. v. Point Richmond Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Vining v. Mo-La Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lizana v. Brown Realty Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Crichton v. Halliburton & MooreMississippi Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API