Legal Opinion

People v. Sherman

California Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1893No. 20,922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, Placer County; J. E. Prewett, Judge. Al. Sherman was convicted of grand larceny and appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

BELCHER, C.

The defendant and one Lulu Franks were examined before a magistrate, and held to answer upon a complaint charging them with the crime of larceny, committed in the county of Placer, on or about the seventh day of June, 1891, by “willfully, unlawfully, feloniously, and maliciously stealing, taking, and carrying away one watch of the value of $75, the property of one S. T. Bowers.” Thereafter the district attorney filed in the superior court of the county an information charging that the defendant, on or about the seventh day of June, 1891, in the county of Placer, “did then and there…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. NearyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Ortiz BonillaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  3. In Re GilstrapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. People v. MontesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. People v. Ortiz BonillaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API