Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Corbett
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 16, 2013PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
On February 15, 2013, Senior Judge Rochelle S. Friedman, Judge Alan M. Rubenstein, and several individuals alleging a status as qualified electors who voted for Judge Friedman and/or Judge Ru-benstein, filed in the Commonwealth Court a Petition for Review in the nature of a Complaint for Declaratory and Equitable Relief (the “Complaint”). Petitioners raised a single cause of action under Article I, Sections 1 and 26 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, claiming that Article V, Section 16(b) of the state charter— which mandates that judges retire on December 31st of the year they turn 70—…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Firing v. KephartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Bergdoll v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Berardocco v. ColdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Moore v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- In re BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Bargo v. KuhnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Little Mountain Community Ass'n v. Southern Columbia Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- R.A. Greig Equipment Co. v. Mark Erie HospitalitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Carrozza, K. v. Childrens HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.