Legal Opinion

Moore v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 2002No. Docket 230400PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the circuit court’s order granting summary disposition for defendants pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10) concerning plaintiff’s false imprisonment and intentional infliction of emotional distress (red) claims. We reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand.

This Court reviews de novo decisions on motions for summary disposition. Spiek v Dep’t of Transporta tion, 456 Mich 331, 337; 572 NW2d 201 (1998). A motion under MCR 2.116(C)(10) tests whether there is factual support for a claim and is reviewed to determine whether the affidavits, pleadings, depositions, or any…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Stowers v. WolodzkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Johnson v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Tumbarella v. the Kroger Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Willoughby v. LehrbassMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Walsh v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Romanski v. Detroit Entertainment, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  3. Lopez v. Donaldson (In Re Lopez)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  4. Al-Tawan v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  5. Valdez v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API