Legal Opinion

State v. McMann

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 23, 1966No. 2 CA-CR 42PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Appellant McMann was convicted in superior court in Pima county of possession of heroin in violation of A.R.S. § 36-1002, a felony. This appeal from the judgment of conviction challenges the trial court’s refusal to suppress evidence which appellant contended was the product of an illegal search and seizure.

McMann’s residence was searched pursuant to a search warrant and a quantity of heroin, the basis of his conviction, was discovered. A motion to suppress this evidence was made prior to trial. The motion was denied after hearing. Appellant renewed the motion to suppress at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Edward William Porter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. State v. HaggardIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Deeter v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. Van MeterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. State v. CarltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. State v. HaddCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API