David v. David
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.
|,The defendant, Richard G. David, appeals the trial court’s judgment of partition of community property. He asserts that his former spouse, the plaintiff, Dione W. David, was allocated more in assets and reimbursements than the amounts' authorized by law. For the reasons that follow, we affirm as amended the judgment of the trial court. We do not consider Dione’s request for attorney fees based on her assertion of a frivolous appeal as no Answer was filed to Richard’s appeal.
I
ISSUES
We must decide:(1) whether the trial court manifestly erred in partitioning the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- C. C. Elmer Tank Boiler Co. v. Art Cleaner & DyersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
- Cochran v. Pelican Well Tool & Supply Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
- McCarroll v. McCarrollSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- David v. DavidLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Arterburn v. ArterburnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- David v. DavidLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- David v. DavidLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Keenan v. KeenanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.