Commonwealth v. Eaby
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 252, Oct. T., 1912, by defendant, from judgment of O. S. Lancaster Co., Sept. Term, 1911, No. 39, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. James Eaby. Indictment for fornication and bastardy. Before Landis, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict of guilty, upon which judgment of sentence was passed.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Morrison, J.,
The defendant was tried, convicted and sentenced on an indictment charging him with fornication and bastardy. This is the second trial on said indictment. The first trial resulted in a verdict of guilty, but for reasons with which we are not now concerned the learned court set aside the verdict and granted the defendant a new trial.
The case was made out on the part of the commonwealth by the testimony of the prosecutrix and the production of the child which, she said, was a bastard and that the defendant was its father. The learned court *621submitted the case to the jury…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RazmusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Donora Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Slavin v. Northern Cambria Street Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RexSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. YancerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Commonwealth v. HarbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Yarmark v. StricklandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Commonwealth v. SloanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.